The long drought in team engagement

A company, WeAreGrowing Inc. decides to add several new team members to its company. They place ads, go through job sites, and recruiters to find and interview the best talent to join their growing company. Lots of time, human resources, and energy goes into finding the right candidate(s) for the roles and after several interview(s), the team members are selected and officially onboarded into the company.

For the new team members, the first few days and weeks are exciting at WeAreGrowing Inc. As the weeks and months go by, these new team members are not “new” anymore and become “regular employees.” As WeAreGrowing Inc. continues to grow, they add more new team members and so on. Sometime in the distant future, few team members decide to leave WeAreGrowing Inc. for various reasons – join another company, higher studies, start their own venture, etc. Then WeAreGrowing Inc. become highly alert on the recent layoffs and in a move to not lose the team members plans to meet them. HR and managers talk to the team members about how much the company values them and promises that the company will continue to grow. Yet the team members share that their plans to move on were made months ago and felt that their personal and professional growth was stagnant for sometime and were not growing at WeAreGrowing Inc.

There seems to be a long drought in team engagement between when new team members join a company and when they decide to leave. A company can convince itself that they did whatever they can at their disposal to keep the team member(s) engaged and growing. However, team members feel that the company did not engage them enough or challenge them enough or show tangible growth during the time they were with the company. Addressing the team engagement issues when the team members are almost out the door is too late!

If a company sincerely believes that the team is their biggest asset, then they should treat them as such – keep them engaged and challenged throughout the team members’ journey within the company. It’s more expensive for companies to find and hire new talent than keeping the current talent engaged and productive. Better for the company to approach their people that they can leave at any point and realize that the team members have many other career choices as well. You (HR, Managers, Founders or Leaders) just have to deliver the message and show that staying with the company is the best career choice for the team members!

Work shifts in a tech led world

Technological advancements has changed how we work, the way we work and when we work.

Although the 9 to 5 work schedule has been around for a long time, maybe it’s time we reflect back on why a 9 to 5 schedule began in the first place and then customize it to the world we live in today.

Robert Whaples, a professor at Wake Forest University created a detailed timeline on the evolution of hours worked in the United States for the Economic History Association. In the comprehensive write up, it’s mentioned that in the 1800s, many Americans worked seventy hours or more per week and over the years, various factors led to our current work schedule of 9 to 5.

Since technology and devices allow anyone to work from anywhere now, what can a work schedule look like? The work schedule can be highly customized to the nature of a certain business. For a service based company, they can take care of customers around the clock and create a win-win situation for both the clients and the company. The company can allows employees to work at times where they are most productive (some prefer working in the mornings, some in the afternoon and others at evenings/night time).

These few scenarios can be addressed with work anywhere and anytime model.

Why wait till Monday morning to address a customer’s problem who faced a issue last Friday evening?

If an employee feels more productive in the evenings/night where she or he can focus better without interrupted meetings and office chatter, why not facilitate that environment? Wouldn’t both the company and the employee win here?

Since the “work from home” is a more accepted model of working these days, why not let teams meet at times where they feel is necessary and not constrain them to a 9 to 5 timeline?