Your Grades Don't Matter (That Much)

First, I have to make this clear. I truly believe education is extremely important and getting educated is the single best investment you make in your life. While your academic success will help you to get admitted to reputed academic institutions and then to a great career in the future, you should also focus on gaining the knowledge and not only the grade.

In Nepalese culture, I believe we overvalue good grades. Students who get good grades get section promotions, top ten listings and perks around the school and in the community. I do understand the point of rewarding good students for their hard work but, what about the students who perform averagely in class and the students who are not good at test taking. Students are grouped in sections depending on their grades and this creates an imbalance amongst students in the same grade level. Also the society indirectly contributes more pressure to those students who are not always the best in their class.

I studied in Little Angels School in Nepal from 3rd to 7th grade and remember memorizing notes and lectures to get good grades. Yet, I don’t have much knowledge now of what I learned because the focus was on the outcome (grade) rather than the process (knowledge). I was driven to get A’s because the “school system” valued students who performed well in class and grades were the single factor that determined your class promotion. Factors such as leadership skills, presentation skills and interpersonal skills took a backseat to letter grades.

Also in hindsight when I think about the education system in Nepal, I was applauded for having the right answers and not on asking the right questions. The education system didn’t inspire me to imagine or question the dogma. Thus my knowledge of the subject was secluded to books and teachers. There was not much room to play around with my creativity, reasoning and arguments.

Then for my higher studies, I attended a public high school in New York City. At the high school, I quickly experienced some sharp contrasts in the education system in Nepal and the US. The discipline and work ethic that I learned in Little Angels School was valuable in succeeding in the classroom. However in my high school, there was no system where an individual who did really well would move to another section. If one did very well, you gained the eligibility of taking Advanced Placement (AP) classes, which can give you college credit while still being in high school.

In class, I had more questions rather than answers because the professor credited class participation and critical thinking. For example in my AP English class, my grade on papers and exams depended on content and critical analysis. If I wrote down everything I had memorized, it would have been called plagiarism. I was driven to think outside the box. The knowledge I gained from the class was important as was my grades but the emphasis was on the first rather than the latter.

What school you attended does matter when you enter the job market in the US. However, no matter what school you went to, your knowledge in your subject of interest is more important than the letter grades you get in school. Your grades will help you land the interview and then a job but it’s the knowledge that will allow you to advance your career, ask the right questions in your line of work and keep the job.

So, my point is that your grades do matter but they are not everything. Grades are only part of your personal achievement. The fundamental point behind getting an education is the knowledge. I believe taking the best of both worlds the discipline and work ethic taught in Nepal’s school systems mixed with the practical and out-of-the box thinking and emphasis on asking the right questions would be an ideal education system in the US.

Government Can't Solve Everything

Government is not to blame for everything and not the answer for all the problems in Nepal. Although I’ve not been happy with the people running our government for a long time, respective authorities in media and journalism should also adhere to higher standards and aspirations. I want my country to be in a better situation and read inspiring headlines rather than the recent Times feature: No End in Sight for Nepal’s Political Dysfunction.

It’s extremely depressing to read headlines like the one above from abroad. After getting frustrated for some time, I then take a step back and try to think about it logically and face a dilemma. From one perspective, I see Nepal’s quandary as a chicken and an egg problem. In one hand, thousands of individuals who have left Nepal and pursued their education abroad, the prospect of going back to Nepal and pursuing a career and earning a good salary is bleak. On the other hand, the knowledge and experience gained by these individuals abroad can help the country tremendously. But what should come first? Should the government first provide the best prospects for someone to earn a modest living or should people educated abroad return to Nepal and drive growth in the private sector?

We all agree there is great potential in Nepalese educated locally and abroad. How can we motivate and inspire the next generation of youth to pursue their dreams in Nepal or have them contemplate about returning to Nepal after completing their education abroad? What can be the incentive for some of the brightest students and professionals to return to Nepal? Nationalism cannot be the only reason.

This debate can go on for a long time. The brain drain phenomenon is a national problem. If we keep exporting some of our brightest minds to go overseas and pursue their dreams but never give them incentive to come back, then the country faces a bleak future due to a lack of human talent.

At the Rockefeller Foundation Innovation Forum, I listened to Muhammad Yunis, founder of Grameen Bank and 2006 Nobel Peace Prize winner who said that governments structurally are not innovative thus the private sector has to take the lead. Innovation is a key element of job creation and industry growth and its basic economics that people will go where they are opportunities. Thus the responsibility of attracting and encouraging talented Nepalese living abroad cannot be only left to the government. Equally, the big responsibility should be placed on our national media. The national media broadcasts what is happening in Nepal to the rest of the world and thus plays a key role in presenting the country’s internal workings to the Nepalese living abroad. Their news coverage and subjects covered can significantly impact how Nepalese living abroad view their native country.

News organizations can indeed help tremendously to counter the brain drain phenomenon. News organizations should shift their focus from mostly political news to highlighting innovative and growing industries in Nepal and occupations that cater to the educated Nepalese diaspora. I frequently visit national Nepali news sites and am drained with political news. I would like to read more about the state of the economy, entrepreneurship, eco-tourism, inspiring media and sports figures etc. By covering a wide array of topics including politics will not only help the news organization grow their market but also provide an overall state of the country and can encourage people living abroad to think about returning to Nepal.

So, the media as powerful as it is has to refocus its audience and cater more to the Nepalese diaspora. Then can we start envisioning a future where a reverse brain drain takes place in Nepal. We cannot continue to export our biggest asset: human capital and not provide incentives for them to return home.